<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1839 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468626</link>
    <description>A minor procedural delay in electronic filing of a return, caused by technical difficulty and measured in minutes, was treated as a technical lapse and not a substantive default, so it did not by itself justify denial of deduction under section 80IC. The non-electronic filing of Form 10CCB was also regarded as a procedural requirement that could be examined during assessment, but it could not alone extinguish an otherwise eligible deduction claim. The matter was restored for examination of the claims on merits, reflecting the principle that directory compliance defects should not defeat substantive tax entitlement where eligibility is otherwise not in dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1839 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468626</link>
      <description>A minor procedural delay in electronic filing of a return, caused by technical difficulty and measured in minutes, was treated as a technical lapse and not a substantive default, so it did not by itself justify denial of deduction under section 80IC. The non-electronic filing of Form 10CCB was also regarded as a procedural requirement that could be examined during assessment, but it could not alone extinguish an otherwise eligible deduction claim. The matter was restored for examination of the claims on merits, reflecting the principle that directory compliance defects should not defeat substantive tax entitlement where eligibility is otherwise not in dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>