https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468632 The writ court interfered where a statutory appeal had been rejected solely for being filed 36 days beyond limitation. Accepting the explanation that the appeal was filed after knowledge of the original order, the court found it appropriate to condone the delay and restore the matter for consideration on merits. The appellate authority was directed to hear the appeal afresh, so the limitation objection did not defeat substantive adjudication. en-us Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2026 19:45:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468632 The writ court interfered where a statutory appeal had been rejected solely for being filed 36 days beyond limitation. Accepting the explanation that the appeal was filed after knowledge of the original order, the court found it appropriate to condone the delay and restore the matter for consideration on merits. The appellate authority was directed to hear the appeal afresh, so the limitation objection did not defeat substantive adjudication. Case-Laws GST Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468632