https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=72797 Enforcement Directorate opposed a petition challenging a trial court summons in a money laundering case arising from a Haryana land deal, while the petitioner argued that the agency lacked jurisdiction because the predicate offences were not scheduled offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act at the relevant time. The trial court had earlier taken cognisance of the charge sheet and directed the accused to appear, referring to sufficient material to proceed further under the Act. en-us Thu, 14 May 2026 16:46:03 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2026 16:46:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=72797 Enforcement Directorate opposed a petition challenging a trial court summons in a money laundering case arising from a Haryana land deal, while the petitioner argued that the agency lacked jurisdiction because the predicate offences were not scheduled offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act at the relevant time. The trial court had earlier taken cognisance of the charge sheet and directed the accused to appear, referring to sufficient material to proceed further under the Act. News - Thu, 14 May 2026 16:46:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=72797