https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51720 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the authorities cannot benefit from their own delays in the investigation and adjudication process. The appellant's goods were found to be eligible for duty exemption under Notification 17/95, despite a rescinded notification affecting exemption availability. Due to the delay causing the appellant to incur warehouse rent, the Tribunal discharged the bank guarantee and bond, allowing the appeal. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:57:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51720 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the authorities cannot benefit from their own delays in the investigation and adjudication process. The appellant's goods were found to be eligible for duty exemption under Notification 17/95, despite a rescinded notification affecting exemption availability. Due to the delay causing the appellant to incur warehouse rent, the Tribunal discharged the bank guarantee and bond, allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51720