<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 230 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51717</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai held that the duty demand on wood veneers cleared for captive consumption was time-barred as the duty was available as Modvat credit to the appellants. The allegation of suppression was not upheld, and the demand raised from February 1995 to February 1999 was deemed time-barred. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed on this basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 230 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51717</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai held that the duty demand on wood veneers cleared for captive consumption was time-barred as the duty was available as Modvat credit to the appellants. The allegation of suppression was not upheld, and the demand raised from February 1995 to February 1999 was deemed time-barred. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed on this basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>