<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 152 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51716</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) that the process of reeling/rewinding sewing thread did not amount to manufacture under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that there was no evidence to prove that duty should be paid on sewing thread classified under Heading 55.08.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:52:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 152 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51716</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) that the process of reeling/rewinding sewing thread did not amount to manufacture under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that there was no evidence to prove that duty should be paid on sewing thread classified under Heading 55.08.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>