<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 795 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791593</link>
    <description>Additional Excise Duty introduced from 11.07.2014 could not be imposed on goods manufactured and brought into stock before that date merely because they were cleared later. Excise liability arises on manufacture or production, while collection at removal is only a mode of recovery; since no levy existed when the goods were manufactured, the later statutory introduction could not retrospectively fasten duty on pre-levy stock. The demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 795 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791593</link>
      <description>Additional Excise Duty introduced from 11.07.2014 could not be imposed on goods manufactured and brought into stock before that date merely because they were cleared later. Excise liability arises on manufacture or production, while collection at removal is only a mode of recovery; since no levy existed when the goods were manufactured, the later statutory introduction could not retrospectively fasten duty on pre-levy stock. The demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>