<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 807 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791605</link>
    <description>A party cannot be penalised for non-compliance with a direction to serve notice on the corporate debtor when the relevant order was not uploaded on the tribunal record in time for compliance before the next hearing date. The NCLAT noted that directions to take steps for service were passed, but the corresponding orders were uploaded only after the subsequent dates fixed for hearing. Applying the principle that no litigant should suffer for the fault or delay of the court, it held that the dismissal of the Section 7 petition for want of service steps was unsustainable and set aside the dismissal order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 807 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791605</link>
      <description>A party cannot be penalised for non-compliance with a direction to serve notice on the corporate debtor when the relevant order was not uploaded on the tribunal record in time for compliance before the next hearing date. The NCLAT noted that directions to take steps for service were passed, but the corresponding orders were uploaded only after the subsequent dates fixed for hearing. Applying the principle that no litigant should suffer for the fault or delay of the court, it held that the dismissal of the Section 7 petition for want of service steps was unsustainable and set aside the dismissal order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>