<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 808 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791606</link>
    <description>A liberal approach may be applied to delay in refiling, but only where the applicant gives a satisfactory, credible and date-wise explanation for the entire period. Explanations based on illness, family exigencies, alleged foreign travel and difficulty in procuring legible records were found unsupported by convincing material and lacking a continuous chronology of diligent steps to cure defects. In insolvency proceedings, procedural leniency cannot be applied mechanically when the delay remains inadequately explained, so sufficient cause was not established and the delay in refiling was not condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 808 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791606</link>
      <description>A liberal approach may be applied to delay in refiling, but only where the applicant gives a satisfactory, credible and date-wise explanation for the entire period. Explanations based on illness, family exigencies, alleged foreign travel and difficulty in procuring legible records were found unsupported by convincing material and lacking a continuous chronology of diligent steps to cure defects. In insolvency proceedings, procedural leniency cannot be applied mechanically when the delay remains inadequately explained, so sufficient cause was not established and the delay in refiling was not condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>