<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 814 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791612</link>
    <description>In a customs classification dispute, inconclusive laboratory reports that did not test all relevant parameters under the competing IS specifications could not safely support final classification or confiscation. The technical evidence had to be clarified before any adverse finding against the importer could stand. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh examination by an appropriate Government laboratory on all relevant parameters, and provisional clearance was allowed on bond and bank guarantee pending a conclusive report. The importer&#039;s declared classification was to govern interim clearance until retesting produced a definitive result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 814 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791612</link>
      <description>In a customs classification dispute, inconclusive laboratory reports that did not test all relevant parameters under the competing IS specifications could not safely support final classification or confiscation. The technical evidence had to be clarified before any adverse finding against the importer could stand. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh examination by an appropriate Government laboratory on all relevant parameters, and provisional clearance was allowed on bond and bank guarantee pending a conclusive report. The importer&#039;s declared classification was to govern interim clearance until retesting produced a definitive result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>