https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51710 The CEGAT, Mumbai held that the suspension power under Regulation 21(2) of the CHA Licensing Regulations, 1984 is an extraordinary emergency measure intended for immediate use where negligence or culpability is noticed. Because the suspension was ordered long after the alleged misconduct arose and the allegations were still pending adjudication, the drastic power was unwarranted and reflected lack of application of mind. The suspension order was set aside, while the Commissioner was left free to proceed under Regulation 23 after completion of proceedings. en-us Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:42:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51710 The CEGAT, Mumbai held that the suspension power under Regulation 21(2) of the CHA Licensing Regulations, 1984 is an extraordinary emergency measure intended for immediate use where negligence or culpability is noticed. Because the suspension was ordered long after the alleged misconduct arose and the allegations were still pending adjudication, the drastic power was unwarranted and reflected lack of application of mind. The suspension order was set aside, while the Commissioner was left free to proceed under Regulation 23 after completion of proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51710