<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 200 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51710</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal of a CHA firm, revoking the suspension of its license by the Commissioner. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner&#039;s use of extraordinary power was unjustified as the alleged offence was not proven in adjudication proceedings. The Commissioner was directed to proceed against the CHA under Regulation 23. (2002 (11) TMI 200 - CEGAT, Mumbai)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 200 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51710</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal of a CHA firm, revoking the suspension of its license by the Commissioner. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner&#039;s use of extraordinary power was unjustified as the alleged offence was not proven in adjudication proceedings. The Commissioner was directed to proceed against the CHA under Regulation 23. (2002 (11) TMI 200 - CEGAT, Mumbai)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>