https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51709 Delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was condoned because the appellant relied on the time-limit stated in the departmental order, which indicated that three months were available for appeal. The delay was treated as not deliberate or blameworthy, since the departmental communication was misleading and the revised limitation period was not clearly reflected in the order served on the appellant. The impugned order was set aside and the matters were remitted for decision on merits. en-us Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:41:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51709 Delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was condoned because the appellant relied on the time-limit stated in the departmental order, which indicated that three months were available for appeal. The delay was treated as not deliberate or blameworthy, since the departmental communication was misleading and the revised limitation period was not clearly reflected in the order served on the appellant. The impugned order was set aside and the matters were remitted for decision on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51709