<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Search-linked reassessment and cross-examination requirements shape Section 68 scrutiny; reassessment upheld, additions remanded for fresh inquiry.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99763</link>
    <description>In search-linked reassessment under the post-01.04.2021 regime, a search, a post-assessment statement, and field verification were treated as fresh tangible material supporting a reasoned belief of escapement; the challenge based on change of opinion and absence of incriminating material was rejected. For the unexplained cash credit issue, the Tribunal found that the Revenue relied substantially on an adverse third-party statement that was uncorroborated, while the assessee was denied cross-examination, amounting to a serious breach of natural justice. It also noted that Section 68 applies only to credits received in the relevant year, not opening balances, and remitted the additions for fresh adjudication after cross-examination and proper inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Search-linked reassessment and cross-examination requirements shape Section 68 scrutiny; reassessment upheld, additions remanded for fresh inquiry.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99763</link>
      <description>In search-linked reassessment under the post-01.04.2021 regime, a search, a post-assessment statement, and field verification were treated as fresh tangible material supporting a reasoned belief of escapement; the challenge based on change of opinion and absence of incriminating material was rejected. For the unexplained cash credit issue, the Tribunal found that the Revenue relied substantially on an adverse third-party statement that was uncorroborated, while the assessee was denied cross-examination, amounting to a serious breach of natural justice. It also noted that Section 68 applies only to credits received in the relevant year, not opening balances, and remitted the additions for fresh adjudication after cross-examination and proper inquiry.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>