<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Works contract classification and threshold exemption defeated service tax demand, with extended limitation held unavailable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99748</link>
    <description>Receipts from a composite activity involving both sale of goods and supply of services could not be taxed as pure service income without first classifying the activity as works contract and considering the composition scheme; the demand on the full receipt value was therefore unsustainable. The appellant was also found eligible for the small service provider threshold exemption for the relevant year, supporting a bona fide belief that no service tax was payable. In that position, suppression with intent to evade was not established, the extended period of limitation was unavailable, and the demand, interest and penalties were barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Works contract classification and threshold exemption defeated service tax demand, with extended limitation held unavailable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99748</link>
      <description>Receipts from a composite activity involving both sale of goods and supply of services could not be taxed as pure service income without first classifying the activity as works contract and considering the composition scheme; the demand on the full receipt value was therefore unsustainable. The appellant was also found eligible for the small service provider threshold exemption for the relevant year, supporting a bona fide belief that no service tax was payable. In that position, suppression with intent to evade was not established, the extended period of limitation was unavailable, and the demand, interest and penalties were barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:01:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>