<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1810 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468579</link>
    <description>Cash deposits were not liable to addition under section 69A where the assessee had already disclosed commission income under an income declaration scheme and furnished the names, addresses, PAN details and bank trail of the beneficiary concerns. The bank records showed immediate transfer of the deposited cash to the named beneficiaries, and the assessee&#039;s explanation that he had no independent source to make such deposits was supported by the surrounding material. In the absence of any contrary evidence or rebuttal from the Department, treating the entire cash deposits as unexplained income was held to be unjustified and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 21:06:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1810 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468579</link>
      <description>Cash deposits were not liable to addition under section 69A where the assessee had already disclosed commission income under an income declaration scheme and furnished the names, addresses, PAN details and bank trail of the beneficiary concerns. The bank records showed immediate transfer of the deposited cash to the named beneficiaries, and the assessee&#039;s explanation that he had no independent source to make such deposits was supported by the surrounding material. In the absence of any contrary evidence or rebuttal from the Department, treating the entire cash deposits as unexplained income was held to be unjustified and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>