<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 185 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51704</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding club clearances of two companies was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to a lack of evidence proving common ownership. The show cause notice was issued to one company only, violating principles of natural justice. The appeal was rejected as the Revenue failed to establish that both companies belonged to the same manufacturer. (2002 (10) TMI 185 - CEGAT, Court No. IV, New Delhi)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:26:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 185 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51704</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding club clearances of two companies was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to a lack of evidence proving common ownership. The show cause notice was issued to one company only, violating principles of natural justice. The appeal was rejected as the Revenue failed to establish that both companies belonged to the same manufacturer. (2002 (10) TMI 185 - CEGAT, Court No. IV, New Delhi)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>