<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 2014 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468592</link>
    <description>Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to reargue the matter. On examination of the review petitions, no such apparent error was found and no ground for review was established. The petitions therefore did not merit interference and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 2014 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468592</link>
      <description>Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to reargue the matter. On examination of the review petitions, no such apparent error was found and no ground for review was established. The petitions therefore did not merit interference and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>