<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 149 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51702</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as the letter in question was not deemed an order by the Commissioner acting as an adjudicating authority. It stressed the importance of the Commissioner issuing formal orders after providing notice and a hearing to allow for proper appellate recourse for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 149 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51702</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as the letter in question was not deemed an order by the Commissioner acting as an adjudicating authority. It stressed the importance of the Commissioner issuing formal orders after providing notice and a hearing to allow for proper appellate recourse for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>