<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 149 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51702</link>
    <description>Appellate jurisdiction under the Central Excise Act lies only against an order passed by the Commissioner in an adjudicatory capacity. A communication or letter merely conveying the Commissioner&#039;s decision on transfer of unutilised Modvat credit is not itself an appealable order. As the appeal was not directed against any adjudicatory order, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain it and the appeal was rejected as not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 149 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51702</link>
      <description>Appellate jurisdiction under the Central Excise Act lies only against an order passed by the Commissioner in an adjudicatory capacity. A communication or letter merely conveying the Commissioner&#039;s decision on transfer of unutilised Modvat credit is not itself an appealable order. As the appeal was not directed against any adjudicatory order, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain it and the appeal was rejected as not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>