<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Condonation of delay in a first appeal on facts and law granted where the appellate remedy was treated as a valuable right.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99732</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal was condoned because the appellant showed personal and financial difficulties, family obligations, the father&#039;s medical condition, Covid-19 related financial disruption, and a change of address affecting receipt of the impugned order. The decisive consideration was that the forum provides a first appeal on facts and law, and that appellate remedy is a valuable right. The Court therefore condoned the delay subject to costs, set aside the refusal to condone, and restored the appeal for decision on merits without examining the substantive dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:45:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:45:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Condonation of delay in a first appeal on facts and law granted where the appellate remedy was treated as a valuable right.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99732</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal was condoned because the appellant showed personal and financial difficulties, family obligations, the father&#039;s medical condition, Covid-19 related financial disruption, and a change of address affecting receipt of the impugned order. The decisive consideration was that the forum provides a first appeal on facts and law, and that appellate remedy is a valuable right. The Court therefore condoned the delay subject to costs, set aside the refusal to condone, and restored the appeal for decision on merits without examining the substantive dispute.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:45:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>