<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 19 assistance under insolvency law cannot compel a former statutory auditor absent possession or proven necessity.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99725</link>
    <description>Section 19 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code permits coercive assistance only from the corporate debtor&#039;s personnel, promoters, or other persons associated with management, and only where the information sought is shown to be necessary for CIRP purposes and within the recipient&#039;s possession. A former statutory auditor, being an independent professional and not ordinarily part of management, could not be compelled on that basis to furnish documents, continue audit work, or issue a no-objection resignation. The directions were also unsustainable because the tribunal had not verified possession of the documents, and the insolvency process had already progressed to approval of a resolution plan and later liquidation, making continued insistence on the information futile. The order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:43:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:43:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 19 assistance under insolvency law cannot compel a former statutory auditor absent possession or proven necessity.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99725</link>
      <description>Section 19 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code permits coercive assistance only from the corporate debtor&#039;s personnel, promoters, or other persons associated with management, and only where the information sought is shown to be necessary for CIRP purposes and within the recipient&#039;s possession. A former statutory auditor, being an independent professional and not ordinarily part of management, could not be compelled on that basis to furnish documents, continue audit work, or issue a no-objection resignation. The directions were also unsustainable because the tribunal had not verified possession of the documents, and the insolvency process had already progressed to approval of a resolution plan and later liquidation, making continued insistence on the information futile. The order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:43:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>