<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1407 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468567</link>
    <description>A Local Committee constituted under an administrative SOP to screen high-pitched assessment grievances was treated as a limited fact-finding mechanism, not an appellate or dispute-resolution forum. The High Court held that the SOP did not require the Committee to grant a personal hearing, and that examining the grievance on the material before it was sufficient. Because the applicant had already pursued the statutory appellate remedy, no error was found in the earlier order declining interference. The claim of entitlement to a hearing before the Committee was rejected, and the review application was dismissed, leaving the prior dismissal of the writ petition undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1407 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468567</link>
      <description>A Local Committee constituted under an administrative SOP to screen high-pitched assessment grievances was treated as a limited fact-finding mechanism, not an appellate or dispute-resolution forum. The High Court held that the SOP did not require the Committee to grant a personal hearing, and that examining the grievance on the material before it was sufficient. Because the applicant had already pursued the statutory appellate remedy, no error was found in the earlier order declining interference. The claim of entitlement to a hearing before the Committee was rejected, and the review application was dismissed, leaving the prior dismissal of the writ petition undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>