<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 758 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791556</link>
    <description>Relaxation of bail conditions was sought on the ground of efflux of time, but the applicant withdrew the application after the Supreme Court had dismissed the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s challenge to the bail order while noting that stringent conditions had been imposed and no interference was warranted with the Single Judge&#039;s discretion. Leave to withdraw was granted, and the interim application was disposed of as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 08:40:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 758 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791556</link>
      <description>Relaxation of bail conditions was sought on the ground of efflux of time, but the applicant withdrew the application after the Supreme Court had dismissed the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s challenge to the bail order while noting that stringent conditions had been imposed and no interference was warranted with the Single Judge&#039;s discretion. Leave to withdraw was granted, and the interim application was disposed of as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>