<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 144 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51686</link>
    <description>The Commissioner&#039;s demand of duty on grey fabrics cleared to the domestic tariff area was dropped based on an exemption for finished products made from raw materials produced in India. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the actual manufacturing process. The demand of cess under the Textiles Committee Act was dismissed due to lack of evidence that the machinery was not imported. The demand of special additional customs duty on imported capital goods was rejected as goods imported before the duty&#039;s introduction were not liable. Regarding the duty on cotton yarn, the matter was remanded for the appellant to establish duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:26:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 144 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51686</link>
      <description>The Commissioner&#039;s demand of duty on grey fabrics cleared to the domestic tariff area was dropped based on an exemption for finished products made from raw materials produced in India. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the actual manufacturing process. The demand of cess under the Textiles Committee Act was dismissed due to lack of evidence that the machinery was not imported. The demand of special additional customs duty on imported capital goods was rejected as goods imported before the duty&#039;s introduction were not liable. Regarding the duty on cotton yarn, the matter was remanded for the appellant to establish duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>