https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791583 Allegations of bogus invoicing and wrongful input tax credit under the GST regime did not bar invocation of the general penal law, because the earlier Division Bench ruling was held to permit FIR registration and prosecution on the same conduct, and the cited Supreme Court decision was found not to displace that position in light of the U.P. GST Act. The investigation material also prima facie indicated involvement in creating fictitious firms and facilitating large-scale tax evasion. Bail was therefore refused. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 May 2026 08:40:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791583 Allegations of bogus invoicing and wrongful input tax credit under the GST regime did not bar invocation of the general penal law, because the earlier Division Bench ruling was held to permit FIR registration and prosecution on the same conduct, and the cited Supreme Court decision was found not to displace that position in light of the U.P. GST Act. The investigation material also prima facie indicated involvement in creating fictitious firms and facilitating large-scale tax evasion. Bail was therefore refused. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791583