<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 730 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791528</link>
    <description>Corporate guarantee fees charged to associated enterprises at 0.25% were treated as arm&#039;s length where supported by bank quotations, the selected transfer pricing method and consistent earlier-year treatment; the proposed higher adjustment was deleted. Software cost allocations characterised as pure cost-to-cost recoveries did not warrant a manufacturing-entity mark-up and the adjustment was deleted. Captive power transactions require benchmarking against rates charged by the State Electricity Board to industrial consumers rather than non-comparable exchange or supplier-side averages; the power adjustments were remanded for verification. Deduction under section 80-IA cannot be reduced twice for the same power adjustment. Section 14A disallowance without exempt income was deleted, while book-profit education cess and section 234A interest were remanded for factual verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 08:36:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 730 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791528</link>
      <description>Corporate guarantee fees charged to associated enterprises at 0.25% were treated as arm&#039;s length where supported by bank quotations, the selected transfer pricing method and consistent earlier-year treatment; the proposed higher adjustment was deleted. Software cost allocations characterised as pure cost-to-cost recoveries did not warrant a manufacturing-entity mark-up and the adjustment was deleted. Captive power transactions require benchmarking against rates charged by the State Electricity Board to industrial consumers rather than non-comparable exchange or supplier-side averages; the power adjustments were remanded for verification. Deduction under section 80-IA cannot be reduced twice for the same power adjustment. Section 14A disallowance without exempt income was deleted, while book-profit education cess and section 234A interest were remanded for factual verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>