<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1613 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468557</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a primary credit co-operative society from investments or deposits with co-operative banks was held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), as the Tribunal followed coordinate bench authority and the approved principle that the co-operative character of the recipient did not defeat the claim. The Tribunal also held that disallowance of employees&#039; provident fund contribution under section 36(1)(va) increased the eligible business profits, so the assessee could claim further deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) on the enhanced profits in line with CBDT Circular No. 37/2016. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 19:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1613 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468557</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a primary credit co-operative society from investments or deposits with co-operative banks was held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), as the Tribunal followed coordinate bench authority and the approved principle that the co-operative character of the recipient did not defeat the claim. The Tribunal also held that disallowance of employees&#039; provident fund contribution under section 36(1)(va) increased the eligible business profits, so the assessee could claim further deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) on the enhanced profits in line with CBDT Circular No. 37/2016. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>