<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1657 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468559</link>
    <description>An appellate authority&#039;s refusal to entertain an appeal solely because it treated the delay as beyond its power to condone was set aside, with the limitation objection being the only issue preserved. The court noted that the matter was covered by an earlier coordinate bench decision and, on that basis, the impugned order was quashed. The appeal was remitted for consideration on merits, rather than being rejected on limitation alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 19:15:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1657 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468559</link>
      <description>An appellate authority&#039;s refusal to entertain an appeal solely because it treated the delay as beyond its power to condone was set aside, with the limitation objection being the only issue preserved. The court noted that the matter was covered by an earlier coordinate bench decision and, on that basis, the impugned order was quashed. The appeal was remitted for consideration on merits, rather than being rejected on limitation alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>