<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 214 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51657</link>
    <description>Statutory interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held not payable on a refund arising from non-utilisation of Modvat credit. The refund was treated as distinct from a refund of duty under the Section 11A machinery, and the credit scheme was regarded as having been framed under Section 37B. On that basis, the statutory foundation for interest was absent and provisions linked to Section 11A did not automatically apply to Modvat claims. The refund-related interest claim was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:55:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 214 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51657</link>
      <description>Statutory interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held not payable on a refund arising from non-utilisation of Modvat credit. The refund was treated as distinct from a refund of duty under the Section 11A machinery, and the credit scheme was regarded as having been framed under Section 37B. On that basis, the statutory foundation for interest was absent and provisions linked to Section 11A did not automatically apply to Modvat claims. The refund-related interest claim was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>