<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 168 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51652</link>
    <description>For non-notified foreign-origin goods, the burden under Section 123 of the Customs Act remains on the Revenue to prove smuggled nature by positive evidence. Mere failure by the importer to produce documentary proof of legal importation does not, by itself, justify an inference of smuggling. As no such evidence was produced, confiscation and penalty could not be sustained and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 168 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51652</link>
      <description>For non-notified foreign-origin goods, the burden under Section 123 of the Customs Act remains on the Revenue to prove smuggled nature by positive evidence. Mere failure by the importer to produce documentary proof of legal importation does not, by itself, justify an inference of smuggling. As no such evidence was produced, confiscation and penalty could not be sustained and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>