<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 209 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51646</link>
    <description>A Revenue appeal concerning sanction of rebate of duty on exported goods fell outside the Tribunal&#039;s appellate jurisdiction because proviso (b) to Section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 routes such matters to the revisionary authority. The Tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, and it was rejected as not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:34:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 209 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51646</link>
      <description>A Revenue appeal concerning sanction of rebate of duty on exported goods fell outside the Tribunal&#039;s appellate jurisdiction because proviso (b) to Section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 routes such matters to the revisionary authority. The Tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, and it was rejected as not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>