https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791432 In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the accused was not treated as entitled to a pre-cognizance hearing on the basis of a written objection, because the proceedings are meant to move within the statutory scheme of speedy disposal. The Court held that the materials relied on by the accused were matters to be raised at trial and declined to interfere with the cognizance order. The challenge founded on Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was also not accepted on the facts, and the revision against the cognizance order was dismissed. en-us Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2026 08:50:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791432 In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the accused was not treated as entitled to a pre-cognizance hearing on the basis of a written objection, because the proceedings are meant to move within the statutory scheme of speedy disposal. The Court held that the materials relied on by the accused were matters to be raised at trial and declined to interfere with the cognizance order. The challenge founded on Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was also not accepted on the facts, and the revision against the cognizance order was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791432