<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 222 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that goods containing 25% or more by weight of blast furnace slag should be classified under Heading 6807, not 6803. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and providing relief to the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legislative intent and tariff provisions, rejecting the CBEC circular that contradicted these principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:28:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 222 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that goods containing 25% or more by weight of blast furnace slag should be classified under Heading 6807, not 6803. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and providing relief to the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legislative intent and tariff provisions, rejecting the CBEC circular that contradicted these principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>