<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 638 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791436</link>
    <description>Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 could not be used to deny input service credit for setting up and operating a co-generation power plant because electricity is non-excisable goods and not exempted excisable goods within Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On that basis, the demand for reversal of credit failed, and the related demand, interest, and penalty were unsustainable. The Tribunal therefore did not examine the alternative points on use of services for the sugar plant, limitation, or penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:50:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 638 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791436</link>
      <description>Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 could not be used to deny input service credit for setting up and operating a co-generation power plant because electricity is non-excisable goods and not exempted excisable goods within Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On that basis, the demand for reversal of credit failed, and the related demand, interest, and penalty were unsustainable. The Tribunal therefore did not examine the alternative points on use of services for the sugar plant, limitation, or penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>