<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 640 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s limitation finding was left undisturbed because the show cause notice was held to be beyond the normal period and the extended period was unavailable in the absence of suppression. That limitation conclusion was not challenged before the HC, and the SC found no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition, which was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:50:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 640 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s limitation finding was left undisturbed because the show cause notice was held to be beyond the normal period and the extended period was unavailable in the absence of suppression. That limitation conclusion was not challenged before the HC, and the SC found no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition, which was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>