https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791446 In a PMLA prosecution, revisional interference with orders refusing discharge and framing charge is confined to patent illegality or jurisdictional error, and the court does not conduct a mini trial at that stage. The material relied on by the prosecution, including search recoveries, diaries, notes and Section 50 statements, was treated as sufficient to disclose a prima facie case of concealment and handling of proceeds of crime. The court also stated that money-laundering is an independent and continuing offence, so a complete money trail, naming in the predicate offence, or prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC did not justify discharge on the facts presented. en-us Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2026 08:50:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791446 In a PMLA prosecution, revisional interference with orders refusing discharge and framing charge is confined to patent illegality or jurisdictional error, and the court does not conduct a mini trial at that stage. The material relied on by the prosecution, including search recoveries, diaries, notes and Section 50 statements, was treated as sufficient to disclose a prima facie case of concealment and handling of proceeds of crime. The court also stated that money-laundering is an independent and continuing offence, so a complete money trail, naming in the predicate offence, or prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC did not justify discharge on the facts presented. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791446