<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 667 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791465</link>
    <description>Recorded sales supported by invoices, waybills, ledger entries, Form C, stock records and banking trail could not be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68 where no specific defect was found, the books were not rejected, and the addition rested only on an uncorroborated third-party statement. By contrast, an ad hoc disallowance of expenditure was sustained where the assessee failed to produce supporting bills and vouchers, leaving the genuineness of the claim unverified. The note illustrates that section 68 requires more than suspicion when sales are properly documented, while unsupported expenditure may be disallowed for want of primary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 14:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 667 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791465</link>
      <description>Recorded sales supported by invoices, waybills, ledger entries, Form C, stock records and banking trail could not be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68 where no specific defect was found, the books were not rejected, and the addition rested only on an uncorroborated third-party statement. By contrast, an ad hoc disallowance of expenditure was sustained where the assessee failed to produce supporting bills and vouchers, leaving the genuineness of the claim unverified. The note illustrates that section 68 requires more than suspicion when sales are properly documented, while unsupported expenditure may be disallowed for want of primary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>