<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 676 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791474</link>
    <description>An earlier appellate order was recalled because it dealt with inclusion of service tax in gross receipts under section 44BB, while the Revenue&#039;s grounds actually challenged disallowance of unpaid service tax under section 43B. On the merits, unpaid service tax could not be disallowed where the assessee had not claimed that amount as an expenditure in the profit and loss account. Following the coordinate bench view on identical facts, the disallowance was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 676 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791474</link>
      <description>An earlier appellate order was recalled because it dealt with inclusion of service tax in gross receipts under section 44BB, while the Revenue&#039;s grounds actually challenged disallowance of unpaid service tax under section 43B. On the merits, unpaid service tax could not be disallowed where the assessee had not claimed that amount as an expenditure in the profit and loss account. Following the coordinate bench view on identical facts, the disallowance was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>