<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 680 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791478</link>
    <description>An addition for unexplained cash credit under section 68 could not be sustained where the assessee&#039;s balance sheet showed available cash, the returned income was substantial, and the long-standing earning history supported the existence of accumulated funds for capital introduction. On the overall financial record, the explanation for the cash introduced into the capital account was accepted, and the addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 680 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791478</link>
      <description>An addition for unexplained cash credit under section 68 could not be sustained where the assessee&#039;s balance sheet showed available cash, the returned income was substantial, and the long-standing earning history supported the existence of accumulated funds for capital introduction. On the overall financial record, the explanation for the cash introduced into the capital account was accepted, and the addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>