https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791495 Where an efficacious statutory appeal against an assessment order was available, the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court's refusal to intervene. It held that no error of law was shown and left the petitioner free to pursue the appellate remedy. The Court also extended the time for filing the appeal and preserved the petitioner's right to raise all available legal contentions, including limitation. The operative principle is that judicial interference may be withheld when a statutory remedy exists, while time protection may be granted to preserve access to that remedy. en-us Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2026 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791495 Where an efficacious statutory appeal against an assessment order was available, the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court's refusal to intervene. It held that no error of law was shown and left the petitioner free to pursue the appellate remedy. The Court also extended the time for filing the appeal and preserved the petitioner's right to raise all available legal contentions, including limitation. The operative principle is that judicial interference may be withheld when a statutory remedy exists, while time protection may be granted to preserve access to that remedy. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791495