<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Estimated bogus purchase additions cannot by themselves sustain concealment penalty; non-considered submissions required remand.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99689</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the underlying quantum addition for alleged bogus purchases represented only an estimated profit element and not a definite, proved concealment. The ITAT deleted the penalty for Assessment Year 2010-2011 on the ground that estimated additions alone do not justify penalty. For Assessment Year 2011-2012, the appellate order sustaining penalty was set aside because the assessee&#039;s submissions had not been considered; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after giving reasonable opportunity and addressing the material placed on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:50:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:50:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Estimated bogus purchase additions cannot by themselves sustain concealment penalty; non-considered submissions required remand.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99689</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the underlying quantum addition for alleged bogus purchases represented only an estimated profit element and not a definite, proved concealment. The ITAT deleted the penalty for Assessment Year 2010-2011 on the ground that estimated additions alone do not justify penalty. For Assessment Year 2011-2012, the appellate order sustaining penalty was set aside because the assessee&#039;s submissions had not been considered; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after giving reasonable opportunity and addressing the material placed on record.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:50:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>