https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468517 Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and important matter, an error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient reason; it cannot be used for rehearing or reappreciation of the case. The applicant showed no new development and no self-evident error in the earlier order, but sought complete re-adjudication, which is impermissible in review. No ground for review was therefore made out, and the review application was not maintainable on merits. en-us Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2026 21:17:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468517 Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and important matter, an error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient reason; it cannot be used for rehearing or reappreciation of the case. The applicant showed no new development and no self-evident error in the earlier order, but sought complete re-adjudication, which is impermissible in review. No ground for review was therefore made out, and the review application was not maintainable on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468517