https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468530 A GST assessment order was treated as invalid because it lacked the assessing officer's signature, and the defect was held not curable by provisions relating to service or technical lapses. The High Court also accepted that the patent irregularity justified entertaining the writ petition despite delay objections. Relief was moulded by setting aside coercive steps, directing deposit of 20% of the disputed tax within six weeks, and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after granting a proper hearing. en-us Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2026 21:17:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468530 A GST assessment order was treated as invalid because it lacked the assessing officer's signature, and the defect was held not curable by provisions relating to service or technical lapses. The High Court also accepted that the patent irregularity justified entertaining the writ petition despite delay objections. Relief was moulded by setting aside coercive steps, directing deposit of 20% of the disputed tax within six weeks, and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after granting a proper hearing. Case-Laws GST Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468530