<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2281 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468531</link>
    <description>Under the GST framework, an assessment order lacking the assessing officer&#039;s signature is treated as legally defective and liable to be set aside; the Court also indicated that an unsigned order is not cured by the revenue&#039;s reliance on saving provisions. In a delayed writ challenge based on service through upload on the GST portal, the Court recognised that such petitions may still be entertained on a conditional basis, balancing taxpayer hardship and tax administration. Conditional relief was granted with deposit of part of the disputed tax, protection from coercive recovery, and remand for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 21:17:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2281 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468531</link>
      <description>Under the GST framework, an assessment order lacking the assessing officer&#039;s signature is treated as legally defective and liable to be set aside; the Court also indicated that an unsigned order is not cured by the revenue&#039;s reliance on saving provisions. In a delayed writ challenge based on service through upload on the GST portal, the Court recognised that such petitions may still be entertained on a conditional basis, balancing taxpayer hardship and tax administration. Conditional relief was granted with deposit of part of the disputed tax, protection from coercive recovery, and remand for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>