<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 121 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51628</link>
    <description>Meetha Gutka and Silver Mint were analysed for tariff classification between preparations of fruit under Heading 20.01 and edible preparations under Heading 21.07. Although the goods were predominantly made of dates, the manufacturing process included heating, cutting, adding perfume, sweetening matter, catechu, lime and silver leaves, and they were known in trade as edible preparations for human consumption. Note 5(b) of Chapter 21 supported classification under Heading 21.07, and the common parlance test confirmed they were not preparations of fruit. The goods were therefore classifiable under the residuary sub-heading 2107.91.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 121 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51628</link>
      <description>Meetha Gutka and Silver Mint were analysed for tariff classification between preparations of fruit under Heading 20.01 and edible preparations under Heading 21.07. Although the goods were predominantly made of dates, the manufacturing process included heating, cutting, adding perfume, sweetening matter, catechu, lime and silver leaves, and they were known in trade as edible preparations for human consumption. Note 5(b) of Chapter 21 supported classification under Heading 21.07, and the common parlance test confirmed they were not preparations of fruit. The goods were therefore classifiable under the residuary sub-heading 2107.91.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>