<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2063 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468511</link>
    <description>Service tax was not payable on reverse charge basis for services imported from abroad before 18.04.2006, because Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 had not yet been inserted. The Tribunal followed the settled position that, in the absence of that statutory provision, no reverse-charge liability arose on services received from foreign-based persons for the relevant period. The demand was therefore unsustainable, the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded, and the demand order was set aside with consequential benefits according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 12:54:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2063 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468511</link>
      <description>Service tax was not payable on reverse charge basis for services imported from abroad before 18.04.2006, because Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 had not yet been inserted. The Tribunal followed the settled position that, in the absence of that statutory provision, no reverse-charge liability arose on services received from foreign-based persons for the relevant period. The demand was therefore unsustainable, the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded, and the demand order was set aside with consequential benefits according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>