<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 118 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51624</link>
    <description>Successor excise liability attaches where a private limited company inherits the predecessor proprietary concern&#039;s rights and liabilities, so it can be assessed for duty on pre-incorporation clearances. The assessable value and SSI exemption claims were not finally decided because the record required factual verification and re-quantification after hearing, so those issues were remanded. Interest was sustained only for the period when the provision operated, while the composite penalty on the company was set aside for fresh decision because liability was not separately quantified under the relevant provisions. Personal penalties on the directors were quashed for want of the necessary confiscation-related findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 118 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51624</link>
      <description>Successor excise liability attaches where a private limited company inherits the predecessor proprietary concern&#039;s rights and liabilities, so it can be assessed for duty on pre-incorporation clearances. The assessable value and SSI exemption claims were not finally decided because the record required factual verification and re-quantification after hearing, so those issues were remanded. Interest was sustained only for the period when the provision operated, while the composite penalty on the company was set aside for fresh decision because liability was not separately quantified under the relevant provisions. Personal penalties on the directors were quashed for want of the necessary confiscation-related findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>