<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 2068 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468509</link>
    <description>Imported orthopedic synthetic castings and pop bandages were treated as bandage-like articles impregnated or coated with pharmaceutical substances for therapeutic use, so classification under Heading 3005 of the Customs Tariff Act was upheld over Heading 9021 10 00. On confiscation consequences, redemption fine could not be retained because the goods were recorded as not available, but penalty remained sustainable where the goods were still liable to confiscation. The adjudication also recognised the statutory option to pay 25% of the penalty. The result was limited relief only by deletion of redemption fine, with reclassification and penalty otherwise sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 2068 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468509</link>
      <description>Imported orthopedic synthetic castings and pop bandages were treated as bandage-like articles impregnated or coated with pharmaceutical substances for therapeutic use, so classification under Heading 3005 of the Customs Tariff Act was upheld over Heading 9021 10 00. On confiscation consequences, redemption fine could not be retained because the goods were recorded as not available, but penalty remained sustainable where the goods were still liable to confiscation. The adjudication also recognised the statutory option to pay 25% of the penalty. The result was limited relief only by deletion of redemption fine, with reclassification and penalty otherwise sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>