<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 206 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51619</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to allow a refund claim in a case where excisable goods were sold at lower prices from depots compared to the duty paid prices at the factory gate. The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the correct valuation of goods under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act and the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment. Relying on a precedent from the Hon&#039;ble Madras High Court, the tribunal affirmed that the refund claim was valid, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:51:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 206 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51619</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to allow a refund claim in a case where excisable goods were sold at lower prices from depots compared to the duty paid prices at the factory gate. The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the correct valuation of goods under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act and the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment. Relying on a precedent from the Hon&#039;ble Madras High Court, the tribunal affirmed that the refund claim was valid, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>