<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Divergent Rulings on Consolidation of Multiple Financial Years in Single SCN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16394</link>
    <description>Consolidation of multiple financial years in a single show cause notice and adjudication order under the CGST Act is treated as permissible where the statutory language refers to notices issued for &quot;any period&quot; and statements covering &quot;such periods.&quot; The Delhi High Court, following its earlier view, accepted that Sections 73 and 74 allow multi-year notices and rejected the argument that such consolidation is confined to fraudulent input tax credit matters. The judgment also declined to examine merits in writ jurisdiction because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available under Section 107.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:53:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Divergent Rulings on Consolidation of Multiple Financial Years in Single SCN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16394</link>
      <description>Consolidation of multiple financial years in a single show cause notice and adjudication order under the CGST Act is treated as permissible where the statutory language refers to notices issued for &quot;any period&quot; and statements covering &quot;such periods.&quot; The Delhi High Court, following its earlier view, accepted that Sections 73 and 74 allow multi-year notices and rejected the argument that such consolidation is confined to fraudulent input tax credit matters. The judgment also declined to examine merits in writ jurisdiction because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available under Section 107.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:53:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>