<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 576 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791374</link>
    <description>A civil money claim was upheld on the basis of documentary proof of transactions, including invoices, ledger entries and C-form declarations. Once those records established the supplies and dealings, the burden shifted to the defendants to prove full discharge of liability; their reliance on an unproved auditor&#039;s report and a plea of settlement was found insufficient. The limitation objection also failed because, although the ordinary three-year period had expired, the filing was treated as timely in view of the Supreme Court&#039;s Covid-19 extension of time. The decree was therefore maintained and the appellate challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:50:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 576 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791374</link>
      <description>A civil money claim was upheld on the basis of documentary proof of transactions, including invoices, ledger entries and C-form declarations. Once those records established the supplies and dealings, the burden shifted to the defendants to prove full discharge of liability; their reliance on an unproved auditor&#039;s report and a plea of settlement was found insufficient. The limitation objection also failed because, although the ordinary three-year period had expired, the filing was treated as timely in view of the Supreme Court&#039;s Covid-19 extension of time. The decree was therefore maintained and the appellate challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>